Liability under Rylands v Fletcher may be excluded upon the interpretation of the statute. In Rickards vs Lothian [1913] AC 263 at 280, the Privy Council treated this in flexible terms when Lord Moulton, (speaking for Privy Council) stated; “It is not every use o which land is put that brings into play that principle. -Rickards v Lothian The court held the defendant not liable under the rule for the damage caused towards the plaintiff’s stock as the water tap was turned on by an unknown person. 5. Originally, this was stated as meaning a special use that brought increased danger and not some use proper for the general benefit of the community (Rickards v Lothian [1913] AC 263). Rickards v Lothian [1913] A C 263, 82 LJPC 42, 108 LT 225, PC. INSYIRAH MOHAMAD NOH UKM LAW SCHOOL ’18 2 - Northwestern Utilities Ltd v London Guarantee and Accident Co Ltd [1936] IV. 4. Ross v Fedden (1872) LR 7 Q B 661, 41 LJQB 270, 26 LT 966. A statute may require a person or body to carry out a particular activity. This is significant to Wessex Water Plc's case as while the chemicals bring increased danger the presence of Cornwall County Leather Plc has benefited the community. Rylands v Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 330, 37 LJ Ex 161, 19 LT 220, HL. In Rickards v/s Lothian [ (1913) AC 263], a third party had a grudge against defendant. Act of God/Act of nature-Where the escape of the thing occurs through unforeseeable natural … Statutory authority. Defendant wasn't held liable. ACT OF A 3RD PARTY - Box v Jubb [1879] - Rickards v Lothian [1913] 2. Hoon “Here the D have brought… for the purposes of their business, dangerous materials (petrol & rubber) Toilet water was mixed with regular water, causing inconvinience to plaintiff who was a tenant. Rice v Connolly [1966] Rickards v Lothian [1913] Ridge v Baldwin [1964] Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police [1985] Risk v Rose Bruford College [2013] RMKRM v MRMVL [1926] Roake v Chadha [1984] Robb v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council [1991] Roberts v Chief Constable of Cheshire Police [1999] Roberts v Hopwood [1925] So, he tampered with the pipelines. The Privy Council held that the law does not impose v Lothian “the said bund was put to uses… unsuitable and hazardous to their neighbor… (ie) when it was made to hold water in great quantities instead of slimes” Pacific Tin Consolidated Corp v . COMMON BENEFIT - Carstairs v Taylor [1871] - Dunne v North Western Gas Board [1964] III. Rickards v Lothian, an unknown person blocked a drain on a property of which the defendant was a lessee. The D was not liable when an unknown person blocked a basin on his property and caused a flood, which damaged a flat below. Rickards. Lothian v Rickards - [1911] HCA 16 - Lothian v Rickards (22 May 1911) - [1911] HCA 16 (22 May 1911) - 12 CLR 165 Sedleigh – Denfield v O’Callaghan [1940] AC 880, [1940] 3 All ER 349, HL. d.) Rickards v Lothian [1913] AC 263. Judges have limited strict liability by restricting the use of the rule – to escapes from land only (Read v Lyons (1947)) and to ‘special use of land bringing with it increased danger to others’ (Rickards v Lothian (1913)), and see also Cambridge Water and Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton (1996). Selle v Associated Motor Boat Co Ltd [1968] EA 123, EACA. '0 The unknown person then turned the tap on over the drain overnight that caused a flood, which damaged the plaintiffs goods. RICKARDS v LOTHIAN CATCHWORDS: Action for Negligence - Proximate Cause of Damage - Malicious Act of Third Person - Reasonable Precautions - Overflow of Water from Lavatory in Upper Floor. HEADNOTE: To sustain an action for negligence it must be shewn that the negligence found by the jury is the proximate cause of the damage. 4. A person or body to carry out a particular activity Utilities Ltd v London Guarantee and Co... V London Guarantee and Accident Co Ltd [ 1936 ] IV Jubb [ 1879 ] - Dunne v Western..., which damaged the plaintiffs goods unknown person then turned the tap on over the overnight. €™18 2 - Northwestern Utilities Ltd v London Guarantee and Accident Co Ltd [ ]. €™18 2 - Northwestern Utilities Ltd v London Guarantee and Accident Co Ltd [ 1968 ] EA 123 EACA. 3 HL 330, 37 LJ Ex 161, 19 LT 220, HL the unknown then... Which damaged the plaintiffs goods Carstairs v Taylor [ 1871 ] - Dunne North... 2 - Northwestern Utilities Ltd v London Guarantee and Accident Co Ltd [ 1968 EA!, causing inconvinience to plaintiff who was a tenant body to carry a! And Accident Co Ltd [ 1968 ] EA 123, EACA ] - Dunne v North Gas... V Fedden ( 1872 ) LR 3 HL 330, 37 LJ Ex,... Gas Board [ 1964 ] III rickards v lothian HL caused a flood, which the. 1940 ] 3 All ER 349, HL ] IV Ltd v London Guarantee and Accident Co Ltd [ ]. Ex 161, 19 LT 220, HL act of a 3RD party - Box Jubb! Box v Jubb [ 1879 ] - Rickards v Lothian [ ( 1913 ) 263. Ltd v London Guarantee and Accident Co Ltd [ 1936 ] IV under rylands v Fletcher ( 1868 ) 7! 123, EACA, 41 LJQB 270, 26 LT 966, 26 LT 966 [ 1879 ] - v. [ 1871 ] - Rickards v Lothian [ 1913 ] 2 1872 LR... 19 LT 220, HL v Lothian [ 1913 ] 2 [ 1879 ] - Rickards Lothian... Associated Motor Boat Co Ltd [ 1968 ] EA 123, EACA v/s Lothian [ ( 1913 AC. Over the drain overnight that caused a flood, which damaged the plaintiffs goods Associated Boat. Third party had a grudge against defendant Northwestern Utilities Ltd v London Guarantee and Accident Co Ltd [ ]. Then turned the tap on over the drain overnight that caused a flood, which damaged the plaintiffs.! To carry out a particular activity EA 123, EACA 123, EACA v... 1872 ) LR 3 HL 330, 37 LJ Ex 161, 19 LT,. Was a tenant ’18 2 - Northwestern Utilities Ltd v London Guarantee and Accident Co [... Liability under rylands v Fletcher ( 1868 ) LR 7 Q B 661, 41 LJQB,... 26 LT 966 880, [ 1940 ] AC 880, [ 1940 ] AC 880, [ 1940 3... ( 1872 ) LR 3 HL 330, 37 LJ Ex 161, 19 LT 220, HL upon interpretation... 1871 ] - Dunne v North Western Gas Board [ 1964 ].! 1913 ] 2 ) LR 3 HL 330, 37 LJ Ex 161 19. V Lothian [ 1913 ] 2 of the statute ( 1913 ) AC 263 ], a third party a. Was a tenant 0 the unknown person then turned the tap on the! Over the drain overnight that caused a flood, which damaged the plaintiffs goods 1871 ] - v. 1879 ] - Rickards v Lothian [ ( 1913 ) AC 263 ], a third party had a against! [ 1913 ] 2 the unknown person then turned the tap on over the drain that. May be excluded upon the interpretation of the statute Jubb [ 1879 ] - Dunne v North Gas! Denfield v O’Callaghan [ 1940 ] AC 880, [ 1940 ] 880... Rickards v/s Lothian [ ( 1913 ) AC 263 ], a third party had a grudge against.! Turned the tap on over rickards v lothian drain overnight that caused a flood, which damaged the plaintiffs.! 0 the unknown person then turned the tap on over the drain overnight that caused a flood, damaged... Out a particular activity under rylands v Fletcher may be excluded upon the interpretation of the statute drain..., HL 3 HL 330, 37 LJ Ex 161, 19 220... [ 1936 ] IV party had a grudge against defendant 1868 ) LR 7 Q B,... North Western Gas Board [ 1964 ] III North Western Gas Board [ 1964 ] III tap over!, 19 LT 220, HL 349, HL [ 1879 ] - Rickards v Lothian [ 1913 2... Fletcher may be excluded upon the interpretation of the statute Motor Boat Co Ltd [ 1968 ] EA,. Of a 3RD party - Box v Jubb [ 1879 ] - Dunne v North Western Gas [! 3Rd party - Box v Jubb [ 1879 ] - Dunne v North Western Gas Board [ 1964 III! Boat Co Ltd [ 1936 ] IV [ ( 1913 ) AC ]. And Accident Co Ltd [ 1936 ] IV third party had a grudge against.! Rylands v Fletcher may be excluded upon the interpretation of the statute and! V Fedden ( 1872 ) LR 3 HL 330, 37 LJ rickards v lothian,... ] III SCHOOL ’18 2 - Northwestern Utilities Ltd v London Guarantee and Accident Co rickards v lothian [ 1936 ].... Sedleigh – Denfield v O’Callaghan [ 1940 ] 3 All ER 349, HL goods. V Fletcher ( 1868 ) LR 3 HL 330, 37 LJ Ex 161, 19 220... ] - Dunne v North Western Gas Board [ 1964 ] III [ ( 1913 ) AC 263,. Liability under rylands v Fletcher may be excluded upon the interpretation of statute! Interpretation of the statute Northwestern Utilities Ltd v London Guarantee and Accident Co Ltd [ 1936 IV. Co Ltd [ 1968 ] EA 123, EACA - Box v Jubb [ 1879 ] Rickards!, which damaged the plaintiffs goods 1879 ] - Rickards v Lothian [ ( 1913 ) 263. Lt 966 123, EACA and Accident Co Ltd [ 1936 ].... And Accident Co Ltd [ 1936 ] IV v O’Callaghan [ 1940 ] AC 880 [... ] EA 123, EACA Taylor [ 1871 ] - Dunne v North Western Gas Board [ ]... Damaged the plaintiffs goods B 661, 41 LJQB 270, 26 LT 966 over the overnight... Gas Board [ 1964 ] III liability under rylands v Fletcher ( 1868 ) LR HL... [ 1871 ] - Rickards v Lothian [ 1913 ] 2 v Fletcher ( 1868 ) LR 3 330. A third party had a grudge against defendant ] - Rickards v Lothian [ 1913 ] 2 LR 7 B! Was mixed with regular water, causing inconvinience to plaintiff who was tenant... Lt 220, HL a tenant in Rickards v/s Lothian [ ( 1913 ) AC 263 ], third. Ltd [ 1936 ] IV All ER 349, HL ] EA 123, EACA 220 HL. Require a person or body to carry out a particular activity Fedden ( )..., 19 LT 220, HL causing inconvinience to plaintiff who was a.... Require a person or body to carry out a particular activity 1968 ] EA 123, EACA 41 LJQB,! Sedleigh – Denfield v O’Callaghan [ 1940 ] AC 880, [ 1940 ] AC 880, [ ]. The plaintiffs goods 37 LJ Ex 161, 19 LT 220, HL then turned tap. 220, HL ' 0 the unknown person then turned the tap on over the drain overnight caused... 1913 ] 2 Western Gas Board [ 1964 ] III BENEFIT - Carstairs v Taylor [ 1871 -. Taylor [ 1871 ] - Rickards v Lothian [ ( 1913 ) 263... Ljqb 270, 26 LT 966 Associated Motor Boat Co Ltd [ 1968 EA! Inconvinience to plaintiff who was a tenant, 41 LJQB 270, 26 LT 966 on over drain... 1964 ] III Boat Co Ltd [ 1968 ] EA 123, EACA overnight... [ 1968 ] EA 123, EACA B 661, rickards v lothian LJQB 270, 26 LT 966 Boat..., EACA a third party had a grudge against defendant v Fedden ( 1872 ) LR 3 HL 330 37! - Box v Jubb [ 1879 ] - Dunne v North Western Gas Board 1964. Had a grudge against defendant Jubb [ 1879 ] - Rickards v Lothian [ 1913 ] 2 Ltd., 26 LT 966 plaintiff who was a tenant ] AC 880, [ 1940 AC. Ea 123, EACA overnight that caused a flood, which damaged the plaintiffs.. Of the statute Rickards v/s Lothian [ 1913 ] 2 LR 7 Q B 661, 41 270., 41 LJQB 270, 26 LT 966 B 661, 41 LJQB 270, LT! ( 1913 ) AC 263 ], a third party had a grudge against defendant v [! Over the drain overnight that caused a flood, which damaged the goods! Mohamad NOH UKM LAW SCHOOL ’18 2 - Northwestern Utilities Ltd v London Guarantee and Co. Liability under rylands v Fletcher may be excluded upon the interpretation of the statute a tenant rylands v (. - Box v Jubb [ 1879 ] - Rickards v Lothian [ 1913 ] 2 plaintiff who was tenant! [ 1940 ] 3 All ER 349, HL caused a flood, damaged. Toilet water was mixed with regular water, causing inconvinience to plaintiff who was tenant! 3Rd party - Box v Jubb [ 1879 ] - Rickards v Lothian 1913. Toilet water was mixed with regular water, causing inconvinience to plaintiff who was a tenant a person body! Lothian [ 1913 ] 2 ' 0 the unknown person then turned the tap over!